Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 0%).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Laval |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 2 |
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Laval |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 493Lead | Accurate passes | 350 |
| 574Lead | Total passes | 422 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Laval |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Laval |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Laval |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |