Match statistics snapshot
- Lens created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 2.27, Δ 0.36).
- Lens fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Lens was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.27Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 87% |
| 448 | Accurate passes | 481Lead |
| 514 | Total passes | 551Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lens |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.