Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot created the clearer chances on xG (1.35 vs 0.99, Δ 0.36).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Lille held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 1.35Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.99 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 371 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 451 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lille |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.