Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot created the clearer chances on xG (1.18 vs 1.08, Δ 0.10).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (18 vs 6 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lorient |
|---|---|---|
| 1.18Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.08 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lorient |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 317 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 386 | Total passes | 469Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lorient |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lorient |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Lorient |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |