Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Metz was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 25%).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 10Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 73% |
| 431Lead | Accurate passes | 255 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 348 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Metz |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.