Match statistics snapshot
- Monaco created the clearer chances on xG (1.75 vs 2.46, Δ 0.71).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (15 vs 14 shots).
- Monaco was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 47%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 1.75 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.46Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 460Lead | Accurate passes | 365 |
| 538Lead | Total passes | 455 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Monaco |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.