Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 1.42, Δ 0.07).
- Montpellier fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Montpellier was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 84% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 374 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 444 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.