Match statistics snapshot
- Montpellier fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Clermont Foot was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 25%).
- Montpellier held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 270 | Accurate passes | 447Lead |
| 335 | Total passes | 507Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Montpellier |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.