Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Nancy was more accurate in front of goal (75% on target vs 20%).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 14Lead | Shots off target | 1 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 428Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 506Lead | Total passes | 394 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |