Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 510Lead | Accurate passes | 204 |
| 574Lead | Total passes | 293 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nancy |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |