Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot created the clearer chances on xG (1.28 vs 0.94, Δ 0.34).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Nantes was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 1.28Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 77%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 304Lead | Accurate passes | 279 |
| 395Lead | Total passes | 374 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nantes |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.