Match statistics snapshot
- Nice created the clearer chances on xG (0.48 vs 2.06, Δ 1.58).
- Nice fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Nice held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 0.48 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.06Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 347 | Accurate passes | 475Lead |
| 446 | Total passes | 552Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Nice |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |