Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (17 vs 13 shots).
- Clermont Foot held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Rodez |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 3 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Rodez |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 458Lead | Accurate passes | 226 |
| 537Lead | Total passes | 331 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Rodez |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Rodez |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Rodez |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.