Match statistics snapshot
- Toulouse created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.91, Δ 1.10).
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Toulouse was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Toulouse |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.91Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Toulouse |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 444Lead | Accurate passes | 352 |
| 542Lead | Total passes | 437 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Toulouse |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Toulouse |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Toulouse |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |