Match statistics snapshot
- Clermont Foot fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Tours was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 25%).
- Tours held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Tours |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target | 6 |
| 4 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Tours |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 243 | Accurate passes | 446Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 519Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Tours |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Tours |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Clermont Foot | Statistic | Tours |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |