Match statistics snapshot
- Deinze fired more attempts (15 vs 9 shots).
- Club Brugge II was more accurate in front of goal (22% on target vs 13%).
- Club Brugge II held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Deinze |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 11Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Deinze |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 470Lead | Accurate passes | 220 |
| 602Lead | Total passes | 341 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Deinze |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Deinze |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Deinze |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |