Match statistics snapshot
- Lokeren-Temse fired more attempts (16 vs 14 shots).
- Club Brugge II was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 19%).
- Lokeren-Temse held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lokeren-temse |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 14 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lokeren-temse |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 305 | Accurate passes | 347Lead |
| 387 | Total passes | 439Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lokeren-temse |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lokeren-temse |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lokeren-temse |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |