Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge II fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Lommel United was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 473Lead | Accurate passes | 437 |
| 544Lead | Total passes | 513 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Lommel United |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |