Match statistics snapshot
- Patro Eisden fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Club Brugge II was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
- Club Brugge II held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 5 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 389Lead | Accurate passes | 139 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 221 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Patro Eisden |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.