Match statistics snapshot
- RWDM fired more attempts (15 vs 7 shots).
- RWDM was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 14%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 318 | Accurate passes | 321Lead |
| 403 | Total passes | 407Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Rwdm |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.