Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge II fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Club Brugge II was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 13%).
- Club Brugge II held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 526Lead | Accurate passes | 243 |
| 618Lead | Total passes | 323 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |