Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge II created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.66, Δ 0.51).
- Club Brugge II was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 23%).
- Club Brugge II held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.66 |
| 9 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 518Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 600Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Ii | Statistic | Seraing United |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.