Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge KV created the clearer chances on xG (1.39 vs 1.17, Δ 0.22).
- Club Brugge KV fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Dender was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 1.39Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 4 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 8 | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 633Lead | Accurate passes | 272 |
| 700Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| -1.01 | Goals prevented | -1.01 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Dender |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |