Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge KV created the clearer chances on xG (2.10 vs 1.04, Δ 1.06).
- Club Brugge KV fired more attempts (19 vs 5 shots).
- Genk held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 2.10Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.04 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 365 | Accurate passes | 438Lead |
| 429 | Total passes | 503Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.85 | Goals prevented | 0.85 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |