Match statistics snapshot
- Club Brugge KV created the clearer chances on xG (3.98 vs 0.07, Δ 3.91).
- Club Brugge KV fired more attempts (14 vs 2 shots).
- Club Brugge KV was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 3.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.07 |
| 6 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 480Lead | Accurate passes | 250 |
| 570Lead | Total passes | 352 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Brugge Kv | Statistic | Kvc Westerlo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |