Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (22 vs 7 shots).
- Club Queretaro was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 18%).
- Tigres UANL held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Queretaro | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 12Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Queretaro | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 26% | Ball possession | 74%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 124 | Accurate passes | 473Lead |
| 189 | Total passes | 529Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Queretaro | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 14Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Queretaro | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Queretaro | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.