Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 27%).
- Club Tijuana held more of the ball (66% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 6 |
| 8Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 531Lead | Accurate passes | 227 |
| 597Lead | Total passes | 295 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |