Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL created the clearer chances on xG (0.72 vs 1.57, Δ 0.85).
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Club Tijuana was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.72 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.57Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 218 | Accurate passes | 464Lead |
| 282 | Total passes | 527Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |