Match statistics snapshot
- Tigres UANL created the clearer chances on xG (0.24 vs 1.31, Δ 1.07).
- Tigres UANL fired more attempts (13 vs 6 shots).
- Tigres UANL was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 0.24 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.31Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 251 | Accurate passes | 406Lead |
| 333 | Total passes | 482Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.74 | Goals prevented | -0.74 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Club Tijuana | Statistic | Tigres Uanl |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 6 | Yellow cards | 4Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.