Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo created the clearer chances on xG (0.83 vs 1.30, Δ 0.47).
- Cobreloa fired more attempts (10 vs 8 shots).
- Colo Colo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.83 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.30Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 373Lead | Accurate passes | 287 |
| 449Lead | Total passes | 367 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.