Match statistics snapshot
- Palestino created the clearer chances on xG (0.68 vs 1.70, Δ 1.02).
- Cobreloa fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Cobreloa was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 0.68 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.70Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 77%Lead |
| 246 | Accurate passes | 309Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 402Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobreloa | Statistic | Palestino |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.