Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal fired more attempts (22 vs 9 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 11%).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Antofagasta |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 13Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 13Lead | Shots off target | 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Antofagasta |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 383Lead | Accurate passes | 178 |
| 467Lead | Total passes | 270 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Antofagasta |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Antofagasta |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Antofagasta |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.