Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (10 vs 7 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (71% on target vs 60%).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 4Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 69%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 270Lead | Accurate passes | 216 |
| 391Lead | Total passes | 323 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |