Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal fired more attempts (19 vs 14 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 21%).
- Colo Colo held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 62% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 159 | Accurate passes | 350Lead |
| 258 | Total passes | 440Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |