Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (23 vs 13 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 17%).
- Colo Colo held more of the ball (72% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5 |
| 15Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 7 | Shots outside the box | 17Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 23Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 28% | Ball possession | 72%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 139 | Accurate passes | 462Lead |
| 203 | Total passes | 534Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.