Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal fired more attempts (16 vs 13 shots).
- Coquimbo Unido was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 31%).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 8 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 437Lead | Accurate passes | 199 |
| 489Lead | Total passes | 266 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.