Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 38%).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots off target | 4 |
| 7 |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 326Lead | Accurate passes | 282 |
| 412Lead | Total passes | 359 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.