Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal created the clearer chances on xG (1.72 vs 1.46, Δ 0.26).
- Everton de Vina fired more attempts (17 vs 16 shots).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 1.72Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.46 |
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 12 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 56%Lead | Ball possession | 44% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 368Lead | Accurate passes | 283 |
| 439Lead | Total passes | 340 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.