Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal fired more attempts (23 vs 16 shots).
- Nublense was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 48%).
- Cobresal held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 10 | Shots inside the box | 10 |
| 8Lead |
| 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 9 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 242 |
| 466Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |