Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (0.97 vs 1.61, Δ 0.64).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.97 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.61Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 33% | Ball possession | 67%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 92%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 564Lead |
| 289 | Total passes | 615Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.