Match statistics snapshot
- Universidad de Chile fired more attempts (25 vs 18 shots).
- Cobresal was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 32%).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 13Lead |
| 8 | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 9 | Shots outside the box | 18Lead |
|---|
| 18 | Total shots | 25Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 342Lead |
| 311 | Total passes | 420Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.