Match statistics snapshot
- Cobresal created the clearer chances on xG (2.40 vs 0.79, Δ 1.61).
- Cobresal fired more attempts (19 vs 18 shots).
- Universidad de Chile held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 2.40Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.79 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7 |
| 7 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Shots outside the box | 13Lead |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 18 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 450Lead |
| 307 | Total passes | 524Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Cobresal | Statistic | Universidad De Chile |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.