Match statistics snapshot
- Colchester created the clearer chances on xG (1.75 vs 0.72, Δ 1.03).
- Colchester fired more attempts (11 vs 7 shots).
- Bromley was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colchester | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
1.75Lead | Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | 0.72 |
| OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | ||
8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
7Lead | Shots off target | 2 |
2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
11Lead | Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. | 7 |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colchester | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
76%Lead | Pass accuracy | 45% |
405Lead | Accurate passes | 95 |
532Lead | Total passes | 209 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colchester | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colchester | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
2Lead | Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | 1 |
2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average. |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colchester | Statistic | Bromley |
|---|---|---|
10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.
Colchester leads this block
Bromley leads shot accuracy (+214% vs Colchester)
Bromley leads shot accuracy (+214% vs Colchester)
Colchester leads shot quality (+55% vs Bromley)
Colchester leads (73% vs 71%).
Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.
Bromley leads this block
Colchester — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Bromley leads (0.025 vs 0.025).
Colchester — slower buildup (more passes per shot)
Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.
Colchester leads this block
Colchester leads territorial pressure (+71% vs Bromley)
Colchester leads territorial pressure (+71% vs Bromley)
How well each side limited chance quality and how demanding the keepers’ workload was.
Colchester — stronger shot quality allowed
Colchester — stronger shot quality allowed
Bromley leads keeper workload (+143% vs Colchester)
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Colchester leads this block
Colchester had the edge in 4 of 6 signals in this block.
Bromley leads (19.0 vs 14.0).
Colchester leads (54.0 vs 13.1).
Colchester leads (17.0 vs 7.0).
Colchester leads (0.159 vs 0.103).
Colchester leads (89.7 vs 84.1).
Bromley leads (17.0 vs 14.0).