Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno created the clearer chances on xG (0.34 vs 0.54, Δ 0.20).
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Colo Colo was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 0.34 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.54Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 154 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 245 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.