Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 0.35, Δ 0.22).
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Coquimbo Unido was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.35 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 3Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 70%Lead | Ball possession | 30% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 63% |
| 603Lead | Accurate passes | 183 |
| 706Lead | Total passes | 291 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Coquimbo Unido |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |