Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo created the clearer chances on xG (3.62 vs 0.59, Δ 3.03).
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (30 vs 5 shots).
- Everton de Vina was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 3.62Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.59 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 30Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 73%Lead | Ball possession | 27% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 557Lead | Accurate passes | 158 |
| 616Lead | Total passes | 221 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Everton De Vina |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 1Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.