Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo created the clearer chances on xG (1.00 vs 0.30, Δ 0.70).
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (24 vs 4 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.00Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.30 |
| 4 | Offsides | 3Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 24Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 417Lead | Accurate passes | 248 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Fluminense |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |