Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo fired more attempts (22 vs 12 shots).
- Nublense was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 36%).
- Colo Colo held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 6 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 22Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 66% |
| 351Lead | Accurate passes | 174 |
| 419Lead | Total passes | 263 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colo Colo | Statistic | Nublense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |