Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (0.98 vs 0.51, Δ 0.47).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Colorado Rapids was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 0.98Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.51 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 86% | Pass accuracy | 86% |
| 338 | Accurate passes | 437Lead |
| 395 | Total passes | 509Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.43 | Goals prevented | -0.43 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |