Match statistics snapshot
- Colorado Rapids created the clearer chances on xG (2.33 vs 2.01, Δ 0.32).
- Colorado Rapids fired more attempts (16 vs 11 shots).
- Austin was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 2.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.01 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 405Lead | Accurate passes | 378 |
| 477Lead | Total passes | 438 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 1.48 | Goals prevented | 1.48 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Colorado Rapids | Statistic | Austin |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |